Monster tit cammer who posts on M@nyV1ds. Has videos on $@rah Ra3 site also

You mean JaneakaBestTits or Janeaka Best Tits and Sarah Rae or SarahRae? So JaneakaBestTits and SarahRae or Janeaka Best Tits and Sarah Rae?

This site doesn't do takedowns. Stop with this NSA level obfuscation ffs. When the DMCA notices come in they tell the sender to cram it up their ass

>>240826
100%.

>NSA level obfuscation
"there's no way the NSA could ever decipher J@n3Ak@β3stT1t$ into JaneakaBestTits" ;-)

those "clever" obfuscations are
1. pointless
2. only annoying to other anons
3. trying to demonstrate a non-existent cleverness ("look mum, i'm so 1337")

tagline JaneakaBestTits - Janeaka Best Tits - Sarah Rae - SarahRae

>>240827
It goes like this. New models find the place because they narcissists and they come here. Now that base64 is widely abandoned (and it doesn't take long to hang about and find out what that is) they contact the hosts we use and THEY take the content down.
There are perfectly reasonable reasons for further obfuscation. Stop being a lazy fag and fucking it up or everyone.

Still some of the best tits after all this time. I remember first seeing her on ifriends network years ago. No clue she'd still be around

She is so hot!
Anybody knows her social links, webcam nicknames which are actual now?

>>240826
This site doesn't respond DMCA takedowns.

But the hosting sites people upload their files on do respond to DMCA requests. And since the biggest file you can post on this imageboard is 10mb or so and nobody's found a upload site that doesn't respond to DMCA requests, it's a good idea to obscure names and links to make it harder to take them down.

>>240891
These days that's not how it works, it's the images that get matched first and you can't obfuscate that. Go check out Google Images and look for your favorite models.

People who don't know how the web works post spoilers which only gets in the way of humans, the large scale image is still part of the page source.

It's even in the rules you shouldn't be doing this:

>>6577 (Cross-thread)

wasn't even aware she was still around

>>240912
You know exactly how people are using the internet do you? That's some talent.
No longer necessary =/= not allowed.

>>240927

Guy's right. I write software to protect and find copyrighted photographs as a service for photographers (no porn) and this is exactly how it works.

>>240981
It's almost like there's a way to maybe mitigate one way that some people might find this place but that doesn't matter because there another's way that other, separate people use so fuck trying to hide anything.

>>240912
Yeah, no.

Most of these women don't have the money to hire people who would be able to do something like that. And even if they can, the most they're doing is probably looking through Google Image Search for sites, copy-pasting the original file name into a search, or they're already in the know about what places to go and just go directly to that website.

If anything, we should be making sure to change filenames, never post popular images/first page images in a thread, obscure links, and obscure names on top of using whatever is necessary to hide upload links and new photos. Let these women burn through money trying to take down the upload source hiring those bottom-feeders. Not just choosing to do fuck all while links get taken down.

sure, you could make suggestions based on speculation and fantasies.

but instead of wasting time, we can do it properly:
step 1: upload a few independent batches of content.
step 2: post the links in different ways. some obfuscated, some open.
step 3: measure the times from the posts to the takedowns. compare.
step 4: draw conclusions. if necessary: retest.


>change filenames
>never post popular images
>obscure links
>obscure names
or just check if any of this makes a difference in the real world (see above), and if so, which method is adequate. this chan has done the experiment and abandoned it.


also: >>>/gen/

>>241055
Because posting a couple lines of random code most people don't know and won't use is a "real world" solution? And even if that is a part of something real, whatever services provided by the person who wrote it isn't going to be cheap or readily available to the vast majority of the models who would want to use it.

Meanwhile, back in the real world, places like BBW-Chan or Simpcity show up on the first page of internet searches, just like popular models and their social media accounts. And most people don't change filenames, use unobscured names, and repost links openly for anyone to see.

But you sure showed me. Especially when I wrote

> Let these women burn through money trying to take down the upload source hiring those bottom-feeders. Not just choosing to do fuck all while links get taken down.

So what the fuck are you really arguing for?

>>241092
>posting a couple lines of random code
i don't expect you to understand that "random code". it's just an example from another thread about how easy it is to de-obfuscate a string and how USELESS that kind of obfuscation can be.

scanning this website and looking for keywords (even when "obfuscated") can be done from any old pc using a simple little self-made program. i was even doing it myself while looking for base64 encrypted links and automatically collecting and deciphering them.

the point: there's absolutely no need for a model to "burn through money" for that. any half-baked amateur programmer can write such a scanner, so this kind of obfuscation (links and names) is useless. :-)

>>241092
>posting a couple lines of random code
i don't expect you to understand that "random code". it's just an example from another thread about how easy it is to de-obfuscate a string and how USELESS that kind of obfuscation can be.

scanning this website and looking for keywords (even when "obfuscated") can be done from any old pc using a simple little self-made program. i was even doing it myself while looking for base64 encrypted links and automatically collecting and deciphering them.

the point: there's absolutely no need for a model to "burn through money" for that. any half-baked amateur programmer can write such a scanner, so this kind of obfuscation (links and names) is useless. :-)


also: >>>/gen/