>>223212The pool of people willing to buy content is not that big, and a lot of them are in sites like this looking at leaked content as well as buying it themselves.
It's because of sites like this that people buy subscriptions.
There are former subs here as well as current subscribers, and if those former subs saw that her content got better, they'd probably go back and re-sub.
Shut up about "girls we will never be around." That shit does not matter.
>>223213You do realize you contradict that last anon's point, right? If he's right and nobody here's buying shit, then what's the point of you chiming in if nobody's buying? The both of you aren't getting shit and there's no point to the thread.
So might as well talk about her shitty business practices and shitty content and maybe save an anon some money who might have wasted it otherwise on her shitty content.