>>188075I can see a few things wrong with this..
The first is "define big tits." Because for most normal people and not freaks like everyone here, a D-cup is still the standard for big tits. Angela White, Gabbie Carter, Autumn Falls, and Codi Vore are probably the biggest that most normal people are willing to go when it comes to big tits, and don't even know about or subscribe to anyone much bigger than that.
https://jonmillward.com/blog/studies/deep-inside-a-study-of-10000-porn-stars/#galleryThe second is using Coomer as evidence
https://www.similarweb.com/website/coomer.party/vs/onlyfans.com/#overview8 million visits overall vs 300 million overall visits, and Coomer is dependent on uploads from the small sample size of people willing to pay and also know about the site. I'm thinking that the people who visit the site are a minority of porn consumers overall, and it's going to skew a certain way and that the favorites aren't going to be a good measure of the overall size of an audience.
Also, you didn't provide any breakdowns for that 1.5 million content creator stat. How many of those profiles are active, what are their body types, what services or types of content do they produce, what are the sales of said content, how many subs do they have, how many do they retain month after month vs. how many new subs do they get, etc...
All you're doing is giving gross amounts and then putting your own spin on it. No real breakdowns or ways to actually quantify your statements. Just you saying that the industry is big enough and then using the overall numbers with no breakdowns to qualify your statements.
I mean, I can do that too. But I'm not going to because there's no point.
Even the supply and demand part is off because you're treating it like it's an absolute thing rather than something complex. Just saying that there's Supply and Demand doesn't mean that there's enough of a supply of something to warrant demand or enough of a demand to warrant said supply or that other outside factors can't skew or throw out of wack the entire thing and turn it into a free-for-all.
Just because you have an apple does not mean that someone will be there to buy it or enough people to buy it to recoup any losses made in the selling of said apple. And vice-versa.
Janky as the example may be, essential goods and services works because there will always be a need for those things and you can see Supply and Demand in action. Your ability to beat your dick to your favorite porn, however, is not essential nor is it the standard. So it's going to skew how Supply and Demand work, if at all. Then again, it seems like you're so stuck on the strictest definition of the term to actually see and think of practical application. Too much linear thinking, not enough lateral thinking.
Here's a question. How many big breasted women are there in the world? How many of them have a social media account? How many of them are in the industry and selling?
That would probably clear up a lot of things. But I get the feeling you don't want that so much as you want to feel like nothing is going to change and that the gravy train will always flow. Which it won't the more that women realize the money is shit and the fans are desperate and insane or just outright scumbags.
You wrote a lot of stuff. But it's too vague to rely on, and you're using that vagueness to come to a conclusion that you don't really have the evidence to back up. Because if you did, you would have posted it.
