>>75089nice. a rare, genuinely constructive response
>>75151>>75117>literally 'no u' reasoning>expecting someone to provide adequate references somehow indicates the person making such a request is illiterate themselvesdid you... never learn how to appropriately reference an in-text citation in secondary school? or how to compose a coherent sentence which includes one? because that's a pretty basic fucking mutual expectation within written communication, especially if you're making a particularly specific claim
>You could have used your fat greasy fingers to find out by yourself but it seems like somebody else already did the job for you, smfhattempting to trivialize the process of locating the information by suggesting how easy or simple it is to find doesn't really help your case. if it's so easy to include, why not just provide a link in the first place, as the person making the claim?