>>90443Ralph Bakshi wore their interests on their sleeve and made an entire career from it.
Robert Crumb, much of the same.
JollyJack, if you want another internet artist.
Salvador Dali, you can't tell me that man didn't have a serious obsession with his wife that negatively affected his life on a massive scale, a constant fetishization of Gala.
Even Frank Frazetta, you can't tell me that dude didn't squirm to put curvy bitches in everything he made.
None of these people were afraid to be themselves and none of them were afraid to make art of their own interests. Goose is. Goose doesn't make content that appeals exclusively to minors, Goose just makes content. It'd be understandable to want to keep these horny bullshit and serious kink stuff separate, but then what's the point of a public Twitter account at all? What's the point of calling your "super secret please don't associate me with this" horny bullshit account "Gooseworse," an obvious play on their SFW username? It'd be like if Pee-Wee Herman wanted to bill himself as a porn star so he called himself Pee-Pee Herman and dropped sex tapes.
Again, it's a "please don't look at me" tour. The British Royal Family does the same thing. They rove around and complain about bad faith criticism while only ever forcing the target onto themselves. They're just an attention whore, and the crap they make isn't even good enough to justify it.
