>>46395>Why? Carrying extra weight in the hips, thighs, ass, and lower belly keeps it away from major organs and so it has less impact on overall health. Getting back to your original question, she could theoretically be able to handle farmwork better because she doesn't have fat literally squeezing her heart and lungs.
>Also what would be 2nd best?Every other type...? Worst outcomes are apple shaped women who carry the weight viscerally (like a man), where it's more likely to interfere with organ function.
Of course there are exceptions, we're talking about odds.
>How would this look like?Knees and other weight-bearing joints are only meant to hold so much for so long. So even if she dodges diabetes, heart disease, etc a gal who's 2, 3, 4x heavier than ideal (BMI-wise) has a fair chance of developing osteo arthritis at some point, which would necessitate a knee replacement. And any decent orthopedic surgeon would require her to lose a significant amount of weight first, which usually means WLS.
The irony is that this would be exacerbated by taking up a high-impact exercise regimen, like running.
