>>39248I remember. He was insufferable lol
>>39251>Kek, I think you catfished me once by RPing as an "F", unless there's another Irish Omegle user who's familiar with /gen/ lore.That was almost certainly me.
I never considered it "catfishing" - unless the other person was gullible enough to think they were actually talking to a real woman (no offence), at which point I would terminate the conversation, not wanting to lead them on.
I always operated under the assumption that there was a tacit understanding that none of the "women" on RP tags were actually women. I also felt strongly that anyone who was on text chat (and RP tags in particular) looking for IRL women was retarded. I talked to plenty of "F"s over the years who were definitely dudes IRL, but I never cared as long as they were good writers and into the same kinks.
>The copypastes for extremely specific things were always a trip.I'm convinced that this is part-and-parcel of online text-based RP. So many goddamn people with bizarre, extremely specific kinks.
>There was one regular who claimed to be 18/F/lesbian and wanted to talk to older lesbians in an IRL feedist relationship who would tell "her" what it was like. (You know, for research.)I remember him. He would sometimes change up the message, to the point that I gradually pieced together the (extremely specific) scenario he actually wanted to discuss:
A thin young white woman dating an old fat black woman, with the former as feeder and the latter as feedee, and scat being involved as well (with the white woman eating the black woman's shit). Sometimes he would pretend to be the white woman, sometimes the black woman, but always wanting to "hear about someone else in the same situation". I have to wonder if he ever found someone willing to play along.
