Since this is /gen/, let me just post an open address about how I feel about this site.

I feel like, as a board and community, we are stuck too deep in the past. There's a very clear non-acknowledgement and avoidance of how big the porn boom has been because we only actively choose to focus on certain types of BBW content. Sites like BigCuties and similar are dying and Curvage is rising as the new site for this sort of stuff. Meanwhile, I feel like we completely ignore the girls actually in porn that are in fact the mainstream and are being acknowledged. We're reaching the point where I feel like we need to adapt or die. The fact there's a struggle with ad revenue means we're likely bleeding users and alienating a lot of more "normie" BBW enjoyers. I know I'm going to get people riled up and screechers telling me "THIS SITE WAS ALWAYS GEARED TOWARDS FEEDERISM AND IF YOU DISAGREE YOU'RE A FUCKING RETARD" but that's not what I'm saying.

I'm not saying remove the niche fringe. I'm saying we should find a way to be more welcoming to the BBW enjoyers who enjoy girls like Asstyn Martin, Julie Ginger, Mia Dior and those types that are names in the community people recognize. Not "girl from 20 years ago who only did solo content stuffing her face and weighing herself". There are BBW enjoyers of all types, and if we want to grow and bring this site back from the grave (and possibly outweigh the schizos). There are things that need to be done and that includes lowering the gate a bit.

Again, I know I'm going to get people who disagree, self haters telling me we need to stop enabling this shit at all and oldheads that have no interest in pushing forward, but this is the way we win. The fact that BBWs are having a moderately positive influence on society and WE ARE NOT CAPITALIZING ON THAT FACT is fucking stupid and is a dead man's game.
The guard needs to change at some point, that's all I'm really saying.

I agree anon, I feel like this site caters to niche porn collector types who have a different relationship to this shit than most bbw lovers. Personally I’d like to see more discussion of mainstream porn featuring bbws and things like sharing good tik tok fatties.

However this is a niche fetish and the chan style is already unwelcoming to normies so who knows.

"the way we win"??? win what??? i dont give a shit about catering to regular bbw lovers, that stuff is all over the internet, i want to be able to autistically talk about death feedism without npcs moralfagging it up. sites already barely holding together as it is, i like our little isolated corner of the internet.

NEVER!

RETVRN TO FEEDERISM

It is not enough for women to be fat, they must get fatter. I will never surrender our ancestral homeland to the hordes of normies who will never understand the joy of seeing a woman grow.

>>28741
I mean "the way we win" more as "the way to prevent the death of this site"

>>28738
Exactly, I'm glad to see another anon here gets it.
There's genuinely no real place to discuss non-niche BBWs.
4chan will shit all over you(unless you're on /gif/ and in that case ,there's no discussion) and the other BBW sites cater solely to nicheness.

Some of us literally just want to fuck fatties and that's all. What is the problem with that?

>I'm saying we should find a way to be more welcoming to the BBW enjoyers who enjoy girls like Asstyn Martin, Julie Ginger, Mia Dior

No idea who any of these shores are but OP caught my attention with Black Lagoon Pic. Need Balalaika gf except fatter.

Nah seriously if this imageboard became (more) Redditized I would become sick. At the very least, actively seeking bigger audiences should necessitate stricter rules and more filters. For example, no emojis, no being overly annoying in a normie way, enforce anti-begging rules even more, etc.

i feel like the demographic of people who are fat fags, willing to use a chan site, and also are vehemently against/disgusted by feedism to the point where they cant use the site as is, is vanishingly small.
im fairly new here and not into feedism at all, but ive never encountered that as an issue to my browsing. i think the "gate" is probably that a lot of potentially interested parties dont know this site exists. ive been jacking off to fat porn online for the past 10 years and only incidentally found bbwchan through a bhm thread on /d/

>>28719 (OP)
Yes I'm old, but this is a stupid post. You act like you're helpless in deciding what this site is about, despite the fact it's 100% user-generated. Rather than blame us olds for posting shit you don't like, be the change you want to see. Try posting more of what you're into and you'll attract young, hip dudes like yourself who are into the same. I might not be into a lot of it, so I'll scroll on by. Or I might get turned onto something new and get out of my 20 year rut. Win-win, rather than whine-whine.

A new hardcore-focused board could def increase the amount of models talked about here, I don't remember seeing so much smallfats here before the BBW/SSBBW split.

You'll see more porn models at /booty and /bbw then /ssbbw cause there are simply more porn actresses who fit those bills.
Where are the SSBBWs doing porn? Let alone with the looks of the BigCuties? Maybe that's why you keep tabs on /ssbbw while not caring about most of the content shared there, the idle hope a good-looking SSBBW porn actress storms the scene one day. The models you've mentioned also coincidentally do mostly interracial, it could be that the users here have trouble inserting themselves in such scenes.

The overarching situation that you're looking at at most boards is that there are 1000s of lurkers but only a handful willing to contribute (what about you?). That's why the Curvage mod thread here came across to me as fake, there isn't that much piracy here that it could completely discourage a model. Maybe it's because most lurkers are only mildly interested in the whole thing and don't necessarily need fat girls to get off.

>>28755 It's been discussed in the past and there's no point. There have been better ideas for boards than a hardcore board that have not seen the light of day. I agree that more boards are necessary but not replacement boards like what became of the more niche boards.

>>28755
>the models you've mentioned also coincidentally do mostly interracial, it could be that the users here have trouble inserting themselves in such scenes.

I feel like that's more of a "curse of the scene" than anything else, not many white dudes are willing to work with BBWs. Which is why I get why non-blacks tend to shift towards the more nicher sides of this fetish since that area tends to be "uninfiltrated" as it were and easier to self insert into.
Also those were the names that popped into my mind at the time of making that post. While it tends to lean that way, there are BBWs who do fuck white men.
Also I have made posts on a few boards and started threads on both /bbw/ and /booty/


>>28756
Just because something was discussed in the past, unless a firm "no" is stated, that never means its truly off the table

>>28749
I'm not disgusted either by it. I just think that only appealing to a niche, despite it being a chan site, is not a good thing.

>>28748
>Stricter rules are a bad thing
Also based on being a fellow Black Lagoon fan

>>28760 No. What you mentioned specifically has been regarded as not as good of an idea as some of the others and yet kone of them have fruitioned into reality. Also,
>not many white dudes are willing to work with BBWs
I disagree with everything you replied to post 28755. I think you are either lost or delirious. Most bbw models are considered ugly, and nothing else. If there were less ugly models like there was in the past then more straight dudes would wish to fuck them. I haven't watched that anime, but if the anime had uglier girl characters introduced then there would be less anime watched by straight dudes.

>>28761
>Most BBW models are considered ugly compared to what existed in the past

Dude, are you 10 years behind everyone else?

This is exactly what I mean by it being an age thing. You have a specific idea of what a BBW should look like and if she doesn't look like it, she's "ugly".
Fatties now are better than they have been ever, fuck your "glory years"

>>28763
>Fatties now are better than they have been ever
You honestly mean to say that they are "better looking" than they used to be? If so, then you are off your rocker. Not only is the average model not "better looking", even the best are not as sexy as the old "average" model. This is all without taking into account any natural skill in sex performance and all the rest. I disagree. These days models on average under-perform on all fronts, and it's nothing revolutionary. It's simply the way it's always been. I'm sure some things have improved, but I can't think of any, and it's probably not by a whole lot.

If I wanted a great wife I would either marry your grandma with the huge boobs, or your daughter. The reallllllllly young 1. It's just the way things are. You can hate me and call me names because I don't mind, but you will let me do me.

>>28766
Again, you're objectively wrong. We are really in the prime at this moment.
I'm normally a "there are no bad opinions" type of guy but this is the rare time where I can say. Yes, your opinion is bad and you should absolutely feel bad for having it. You're out here caring about "performance" when that has truly never mattered, it's about the body and the girl with said body.

If you've come to this conclusion, you are not looking hard enough/ don't care to look hard enough.

>>28767 Performance is not the only thing or may not be an individual's most important thing but it can matter and that model isn't horrendous-looking but she's not cute bbw and the photo sucks. But yes I would still fuck her that's not the issue. She loves cock. I love vagina. The issue is that I've come very close to kissing a cuter girl than that model IRL and real life is better than imagination and phone sex.

>>28783
>real life
>mattering on a porn site like this

Take these, you desperately need them

>>28744
Glory to thee. If you like fat women but don’t like feedism, thou aren’t worthy; begone.

I'll be honest, I think everyone that is degenerate enough to come on a fucking chan site on a regular basis are either autistic and/or porn addicted coomers who think they can stop whenever they want but keep coming after 10+ years.


wait....

>Weird Canadian dude got his schizo posts removed
A rare "based jannies" moment

>>28811 And we all know you have such an outstanding record of being correct.... Not. I agree though you're probably mostly homosexuals but I admit that I don't know much about homosexuals I've known maybe 3 with 1 of them more well than the rest. I happen to be 1 of those that don't give a fuck.

>>28813
Think you’ve had the wrong mushrooms with your frogs legs mate.

>>28814 You're not funny enough for me to care wtf you're saying, but I will tell you this, the only penises I would ever suck hang between the legs of girls far more beautiful than you could ever imagine & jerk off to, let me assure you. I can already tell you that it's not very likely that any of them would ever like you.

>>28815
Sucer une graine tout court c'est gay and tabarnak.
Une femme peut pas avoir une queue, et tu dis que t'es pas homosexuel.

No, you're right.


I'm tired of seeing the same 5 fucking threads on top of /ssbbw/ and the rest of the boards slowly becoming a "whatever goes" piles of garbage, with retarded coomers posting one or two photos from their iPhone to start a thread begging for "wins" or a """mega""", like we're on T i T or some shit.

it amazes me how there's plenty newcomers, both professionally or amateur, that the chan would go fucking nuts about if they stopped sharing the same 30 adeline vids over and over. like holy shit are you that nostalgic or just autistic

>>28719 (OP)
gay

>>28885
Lead the way?

I mean, It’s not like there is anything preventing anyone from exposing the Chan to new content

The threads that exist are just a reflection of who takes the initiative

>>28907 I agree. Do you agree that it's a problem?