/gen/

(504 KB, 1129x1049, curvage.jpg)
Where is the line that makes porn different from not porn when it comes to fat girl images?
Not sure if this is official but open vag/asshole, hard dicks, and penetration seem to be the dividing line between porn and "erotica."
>>15443 (OP)
I think they're referring to hardcore porn, because curvage is already a softcore porn site.
Porn is sex
Nudity is art
>>16126
Porn is sex the same way WWE is combat
I look forward to hearing the answer.
Now I’m confused.
If porn require an act of multiple people going at it or even a lone person recording a during a masturbate, I guess I was never into porn all these years.
>>16137
neither of them is real, mostly acting.
Nipples
I was a moderator on curvage for a while and there were a bunch of discussions with Jason the admin about this. Lots of arguments with models too, because of how inconsistently the rule was enforced.
Basically the rule on curvage is that there is a presumption of nudity unless underwear is visible in the video. So if a model has a body type where the underwear is covered by skin, we couldn’t approve the video. Also: no nipples. The problem was that if the model was really popular, she could get away with more, if she pushed it. Most of the popular models didn’t actually try to push it, but the few who didn’t caused a lot of complaints with the other models
>>17448
Not surprised to hear this, Curvage is a cash grab with a vestigial forum attached at this point.

As someone who has only lurked but has done so since day 1, it is interesting how much they churn through mods and repeat posters… like there are waves of names that were active and just disappeared one day. I’ve always wondered if they went back to lurking or things happen that cause them to swear the place off.
>>17462
Highly transactional. Feels like Vegas
>>17448

So is Jason too cheap to chip in for a porn license for the site, or is he an art snob who views a bare titty as repulsive
>>17877
I’ve seen his old forums and sites which are still online, if you know where to look. They are very shit, but contain lots of nudity and also lots of excited text from him asking for more nudes to be contributed to the site. So it definitely isn’t that.
It’s just because a lot of payment processors don’t want to deal with porn at all. Simple as that.
>>18498

That's a bullshit excuse when almost every other porn site has payment processing options, even before and after the PH controversy.

Hell some sites like Manyvids even take Bitcoin as payment. The Stuffer31 guy still has Visa/Mastercard access and his business license expired over a decade ago.
>>18509
I don't think they disallow it entirely, they just charge higher rates for porn sites iirc. curvage bans nudity and explicitly sexual acts because the owner's a cheapskate, not because they're a prude lol (and it has the added side benefit of attracting models who would be uncomfortable doing explicit content into a place where they won't be pressured to do so ig)
>>18510

>>and it has the added side benefit of attracting models who would be uncomfortable doing explicit content into a place where they won't be pressured to do so ig

You mean like Onlyfans, which allows both nudity and non-nudity?
>>18529
Didn't OF start off as porn or no?
>>19061

Yes before celebrities and kid diddlers fucked it up for everyone.

Now it's half-porn, half-paid Instagram.
>>15443 (OP)
no idea, but the reason curvage forbids porn is to cheapen payment processing fees.
>>19208

So it's back to Jason being a cheapskate then? We already knew that.

Back to top