If there was an alternative to Curvage (without that weirdo S77 and his policies) would you use it?

Short answer: Hell yes.

Longer answer: What policies specifically? All I can think of is the bizarre ban on nudity, like a nipple is so shocking on a site where women gain weight on purpose and dress up as hucows.

You bet. It’s such a cash grab for clips there’s basically no forum content anymore aside from models trying to drum up sales. I don’t even see the mods participate anymore.

I’m hardly one of those “it’s a community!” guys but I used to actually enjoy checking in to see new posts.

I thought they said at one point the nudity thing was about their web hosting not being set up for hardcore porn or something, and being too lazy to change it, I dunno.

Hell yes, if only to get away from that Loves2spooge weirdo fucker.

For me it would depend more on how easy to use the alternative site is and which models join or switch to it.

Curvage has declined as a community but there seems to be a growing institutional inertia behind it due to just how many models are regularly posting on there (c4s and MV, for comparison, are almost dead for female WG and are significantly harder to navigate). The nudity thing is a bit of a buzzkill but I'm willing to put up with it for the sheer variety of content and ease of use.

Also, I know I'm in the minority here, but I'm also genuinely not into hardcore (which I know is different from nudity) and if the alternative site got flooded with that would be more annoyed than pleased.

>>12291
You're right about the nudity thing. Again didn't look it up but it was either for legal, tax or an issue with payment processors. Basically it's easier to run a site and make money without nudity... not some moral thing as some have implied.

I remember when curvage was a simple forum board and not this weird storefront shill it is now.