>>4375Not entirely true- at least, potentially. There's been research on certain fats being a little more likely to be turned into Subcutaneous fats rather than Visceral. It's only early days, but there was a really good thread on it last year with tons of research and links to articles- but the jist of it was that dairy products and especially pure cream had that specific type of fat in them.
That combined with the fact that Visceral fat is *slightly* more likely to be burned than Subcutaneous means that with the right diet with a caloric surplus combined with enough exercise can lead to potentially better outcomes for us feedees.
I wish something like this was more likely to be researched- but unfortunately we are left with side studies and accidental discoveries in the feedism community.
And yes, unfortunately for us male gainers it is more likely to be visceral fat. But we have to do what we can to even the odds even a little for the healthiest possible* gains
