>>202406Kip has proven constantly incapable. As far back as Lunch with Sister there were complaints about the story - the difference was that the characters were at least likable.
That's no longer the case with most of his output. One of the few shining lights was Full Night Nanny, no doubt as it was so much less ambitious.
Kip isn't just a bad writer. He's inconsistent, he's awful at character writing, his grasp on English seems to have gotten worse and his protagonists are often awful. He thinks he's smarter than he is, but has constantly proven otherwise.
The issue with One Serving Choice is that when it's good, it's really damned good. But that's in little vista points where it can be consumed as its own comic.
The wider story is awful, with an awful main character being an unlikeable cunt, the romance misguided and the plot meandering.
The problem is that Kip THINKS he's good at this. He constantly prides himself on being "more ambitious" than a fetish story, but he's never had one complete success apart from BWS and FNN.
No Lunch Break was still fucking awful. Sydney was hated for being a cunt at first too. It's a running theme, and the common theory tends to be that they're self inserts for Kip - who, too, is generally accepted by most folks who've known him as being pretty unpleasant.