>>161917>Is 20 mins enough time for anyone to decide whether to kill a thread or notDude, you only need a split second to tell if a thread should burn, but anyone who's been here for even a month should've figured that much out.
The reason I said 20 mins is because that's the time that faggot, OP, should've posted content to have some kind of defense; it only takes a couple seconds to a minute or two make a second post with actual content unless your shit's a disorganized mess.
>May be enough to call him out on the lack of content posted but not for nuking threadThat is a good reason to nuke a thread; if there's no content, there's no reason for it to exist.
>>161923I have seen the content and now want the fire more than the other Anon ever did! From the looks of it, that artist isn't underrated, they're overrated from even a single person giving a shit about such shoddy 3d artwork.