This guy's art is absolutely nuts. Goes by EmilyWithLove on DA and EmilyEW on Patreon. Need a hero to drop his Patreon stuff.

>>130009 (OP)
How much per subscription?

>>130009 (OP)
pretty sure they just take ai and polish it up. at least thats what it looks like to me. if thats not the case tho cool stuff.

also beg for patreon stuff in the kemono or paid content thread

>>130009 (OP)
It does look really good, I particularly like the barbie one, but it's got some distracting stuff that says AI to me. The second picture has these pointless lines on the legs and the way the shadows around the pelvis taper off is incredibly unnatural. That being said, I still enjoy these pictures.

>>130031
>>130034
They definitely work with AI, yes. Likely a paint over after and in some of the images it looks like they clip hands out of real images and they paste it in.

The impression i get is a "multimedia" blend of 3d modeling fed into an ai program that's then cleaned up afterward. Anyways I got their patreon, it really isn't anything to write home about l, you get stuff like a week early.

>>130034
>I can tell from the shoops being wooped oddly
nigga, just take a look at the "books", the writing on them is nonsensical chickenscratch like in every AI image

>>130115

Can you post it here?

Don’t care I how much of it is AI. It’s fuсking magnificent and better than 99% of the stuff on DeviantArt (yeah… low bar I know). I’d love to know what the process for making these was.

>>130121
there are actual entire comics of this? do the characters get bigger?

>>130115

This.

I don’t mind if they’re supplementing their work with AI but they just posted this long ass rant how they don’t use AI at all. Which is a blatant lie since their earlier stuff looks like basic AI art.

It’s tits and ass, just take it easy.

>>130167 Supplement? They aren't taking performance-enhacing drugs, Einstein. They are having a machine do their work for them. You must be one of those All-American Heroes I have heard so much about. By the sound of it (your comment) your reputation preceeds you.

>>130152
>It’s fuсking magnificent and better than 99% of the stuff on DeviantArt
It looks awful, what the fuck. It's uncanny valley shit that's like two steps away from those terrible celebrity photoshop edits or 3D renders. The AI only adds a plastic glossiness, combined with mistakes that weren't ironed out makes the whole thing disorienting to look at.

Most anything that's even remotely competent and stylized on DA shits on this. But even if you're going for a more realistic style artists like Bigbig does it infinitely better, without using AI as an obvious crutch.

>>130170
Damn who let the schizos out of the cage

>>130009 (OP)
Also mid and boring AI art ngl. Their editting ability to take out the janky computer made proportions is decent Ill give em that

>>130176 You can barely speak English. I had a hard time trying to understand what you wrote then subsequently failed at it.

Hate AI art but in this case they seem to put effort into modeling the body and posing.

Higher effort than 99% of ai trash

>>130009 (OP)
Can't seem to find the deviantart account

>>130121
I was just focusing on the body cause that's the subject man, what more do you want?

>>130195
huh thats pretty interesting actually

>>130202
emilywithlove

Other good ones:
ai-growth
aisecretlover

>>130195
This is the most obvious application of img2img but a lot of people haven't seemed to jump on it, yet.

If none of you are gonna start producing good-ass content, then let the dude give us free fap shit. You guys riding dick harder than these girls if they could get up on it.

>>130195
So it's a mish mash of every single cancer infesting this community's art scene, great.

Same person has authored some half finished and schizo-rambling filled stories on FantasyFeeder. But the smut portions of them are S+ tier

https://fantasyfeeder.com/stories/view?id=306914
https://fantasyfeeder.com/stories/view?id=307966
https://fantasyfeeder.com/stories/view?id=307130

Moral of the story, expect the artist to lose interest and abandon their patreon just like they abandoned both the promising stories they made

>>130009 (OP)
>That 4th pic

>>130009 (OP)
Does anyone have their older art? I know they've posted stuff on their DeviantArt that has since been deleted.

>>134206
Thanks, but I'm pretty sure these images are from her Patreon. I'm looking for stuff that has been taken down from both there and her DA account. Stuff like "Princess and her Entourage".

>>134956
>her

>>134956
You referring the ones of renaissance styled oil paintings of girls getting stuck in a doorframe?

Holy shit this AI is out of control and these images look horrid.

>>135183
Their gallery's hit or miss; but if you can't appreciate the renaissance images just because of robo-boogieman you actually have no taste.

>>135179
Yes

>>135195
Or the fact that half asses sketches are sold up to $50 or more, like low budget NFT's. Robots can shit out the same thing for free and if you think that artists are the victims getting raped, remember: An urinal is considered art.

>>134956

>>134956

>>135261 Fuck Marcel Duchamp. I did an art appreciation class and he was one of the guys I had to cover. That entire thing make me think funny mustache guy had a point every time an "artist" tried to give scribbles on paper "a racial/hidden meaning" or some bullshit.

>>135261
>>135665
The fact the it's been more over a century since Baroness Elsa, Marcel Duchamp and other artists in the Arensberg Circle exhibited their readymades and you people are still seething about them really says something.

>>135667
*The fact that it's been over a century, fuck; point is find someone else to whine about, read a book, etc.

>>135669 I'm not going along with the assumption that some random snow shovel has a hidden artistic meaning.

>>135671
You're unwilling to understand why someone might want to disrupt the 'sanctity' of a gallery or museum setting, therefore Hitler good..? Do you realize how dumb you sound?