>>131579This anon gets it. That's expected some people would reject the notion since it conflicts with their self-perception of being morally virtuous, but the way some of them cope with cognitive dissonance in the most grating manner is always an annoyance.
>The same goes for things like women struggling to control their appetitesHell yeah, that's good stuff. I'm not into big sizes, but slightly chubby girls that can't stop themselves eating and get worried about gaining is my personal favorite. My issue with ridiculously fat girls is that they're already in lost cause territory, so the satisfaction of the transgression is mostly lost. That and they're less conventionally attractive, obviously.
>>131585A lot of feeders have an history of anorexia and/or bulimia. Eventually to protect their mental and physical health, they project their conflicted relationship with food unto others. Of course the process is mostly unconscious. And since eating and having sex stimulate the same parts of the brain, and transgression is a motor for sexual excitement... you get the idea.
For others it's more a matter of dominance. Controlling the amount of food your partner ingest (may it be by force-feeding or plainly being an enabler) establish a strong position of dominance over them. It can also work the other way around, it's not uncommon for abusive people to starve their partner, may it be by psychological or practical means. Although this last part is often much more sadistically driven than feederism. Feedees usually take at least some enjoyment in being fed and encouraged, while people pushed into anorexia by their partner, not so much.