>>54710the AI bot spam even being tolerated is more of a "straw that broke the camel's back" thing
the core problem is that the weight gaming mods are generally retarded
we have yuka's games, shovelware tier at BEST. and the mods do nothing but run to defend when people tell yuka to either fuck off or improve their work.
multiple times have people posted regular porn games there, and yet again the mods do nothing but run to defend the off topic posters when people are (rightfully) trashing on them.
so the mods clearly care for neither the quality of content or how on topic a game is.
and thats just the moderation of off topic/low quality games.
how about the hypocrisy of the moderators?
we have MULTIPLE games that feature fat feral characters, all of them are allowed.
and yet the moment a game with a loli (or a fictional character with questionable age) is posted, people scream and cry for the mods to delete the thread (which usually does happen)
you can either say that lolis and ferals are fine or that loli and feral promote pedophilia and bestiality respectively
but you cant say say that feral is fine while loli isnt. that just makes you a hypocrite
>inb4 buh muh roolsloli being banned isnt the problem, nor do i actually have a problem with the feral games. its the fact that feral is also allowed alongside the loli ban. either go all the way or not at all.
infact continuing on that, how about the blatantly obvious children on the site?
betatoybox is a good example.
clearly a child, the 'games' and ideas he puts out scream "A CHILD MADE ME". not a single adult would make that and think its good enough to put out.
so the mods are willing to ban games with fictional characters that harm nobody, but allow literal children on the site? what a joke.
how about jam judging?
>obvious bias for furry/goblin focused games>"personal preference" section ONTOP of said bias>not just dropping a game out of the competition for not being fetish based or failing to incorporate the theme into the fetish.>a game can be fucked entirely because one judge couldnt make it run but the other two could, and this has happened in the past.this has remained true throughout every gain jam, people have pointed it out every gain jam, and every gain jam: nothing has been done about it.
how about the curated projects section?
picrel is from a few months ago. if i remember correctly i went off of a year to gauge if a project is active or in hiatus, and two years of complete uninterest from the dev to determine if its dead.
only 11 projects here (out of 27) can be considered alive or completed. the rest are either in a hiatus like state or dead.
why are the dead/hiatus projects not in their own section? why are the alive and completed projects not tagged as such?
also
>we change nothing because nothing is wrong>and change the rules when they feel like it.these are not mutually exclusive.
you can refuse to change a rule that people have a problem with, and then change another that people dont have a problem with just because you feel like it
there's more im probably forgetting about but i cant be bothered to remember.
point is: it all adds up, it may not stand out to you but for people paying attention the state of the site becomes very disappointing very fast.
you can deny it all you want, call me whatever you wish, but its all true and you know it.
and yes, i would actually prefer "mod overreach" when the """content""" in question is extremely low quality spam.
nobody gives a shit about the "more interesting chatbots" except for the people who are fine with the shitty ones in the first place.