/bbwai/

[Index] [Bottom]
(66 KB, 800x800, bed664135b54d8e0880a1ee0661ed948ec500045195f49df15912e9c95b8e1b6.png) (2.5 MB, 5120x4096, 191271-number-topaz-enhance.JPG.jpg)
Kemono.party thread? Anonymous Sat 08 Jul 2023 16:17:09 No.8757 Original
Just about every other board on this website has a kemono.party thread. I figured why not make one for AI art? Sure, it may not be updated as often as the rest (I feel), but might as well have a centralized thread. I'll start with some I've found.

VyAI
https://kemono.party/patreon/user/83795640

AISecretLover
https://kemono.party/patreon/user/84622212

MrM1sha
https://kemono.party/patreon/user/90298162

MnemosyneKotorin
https://kemono.party/patreon/user/86508534

I know one of these isn't really BBW-CHAN related, but sometimes they pump out a good ass. Feel free to post any others you've come across!
(1.1 MB, 1024x1536, booty03.jpg)
Anonymous Sat 08 Jul 2023 16:18:37 No.8758
>>8757 (OP)

Couldn't post the other two images due to size restrictions.
Anonymous Sat 08 Jul 2023 16:30:37 No.8761
People pay for ai lewds, lol that's hilarious
Anonymous Sat 08 Jul 2023 18:46:14 No.8786
>>8761

Yes, people do. That's what this thread is for. So others like us don't have to. Seriously, think before you post stupid shit.
Anonymous Sat 08 Jul 2023 20:03:12 No.8797
>>8786
Just a wild concept. Like, I can make a thousand images in a day for free, where do I sign up for charging people?
Anonymous Sat 08 Jul 2023 20:14:08 No.8799
>>8797
just make a patreon and start shilling lol. some idiots will pay for sure
(139 KB, 500x513, ADA05E2D-228A-46AA-97E2-3C1493E25180.png)
Anonymous Mon 31 Jul 2023 02:12:00 No.10376
Hold on there’s seriously people paying for this? Like, I understand paying for the software or service to generate this, but if you wanna pay for porn wouldn’t it be better to pay for stuff that is actually made by a human? That way you get quality stuff worth paying for, and is often more visually varied and choreographed then AI? Like, not bashing AI porn, what gets you off gets you off, but it seems like buying it already generated from someone is intentionally reaching for the lowest value deal here. Just fucking eludes my brain. Hell, there’s oceans of free stuff to skim if you’re just after quantity, so even that argument is iffy at best. I just don’t get it.
boltednuts Mon 31 Jul 2023 02:41:01 No.10377
>>10376
Not the best way to think about it really.

There's been advancements in technology everywhere, it doesn't matter how it's done it's about the quality of the output.

People used to compalin that electronic had less value because it wasn't analog, it wasn't played by humans. But the thing is analog music and electronic music still need human input to be created.

A human can create a bad song or artwork just like a human using AI tools can out put bad images or songs depending on their ability to properly use "AI Tools"

If the output is good, it just GOOD. Doesn't really matter what tools the artist used, judge them on the quality of their output.
iLadiesArt Mon 31 Jul 2023 16:56:24 No.10412
>>10376
It can still take a ton of manual work

I know my process involves a significant amount of manual corrections and over 100 layers of fixes, etc, finished works ranging from 1hr all the way up to 40.

That's like saying you shouldn't pay a photographer, editor, art director, etc. It's definitely tool assisted, but it still couldn't be made without a human.

Downplaying the human involvement is just a disinformation campaign from artists who don't like AI.
Anonymous Tue 05 Sep 2023 06:01:56 No.12327
>>10377
>>10412
Based posts
> Downplaying the human involvement is just a disinformation campaign from artists who don't like AI.
In our community, it was organized by fat artists because their shit can’t compare with AI arts
Anonymous Tue 05 Sep 2023 11:54:40 No.12335
amazing
Back to top