>>152518You clearly didn't actually read her comments, or even ours for that matter. Nobody here or their ever claimed that CGGF was lying about quitting or hiding her weight loss, nor did anyone ever claim that there's an expectation on feedees who actively gain to continuously gain in perpetuity. On Curvage, she said that most OTHER feedees who want to maintain or lose weight don't announce it and don't owe it to their audience to do so. That's not how this relationship works, that's just entitlement. She also pulled the classic bullshit of, "Why are you so pressed about other people's bodies, huh?" as if the entire point of Curvage and feederism accounts on other platforms isn't to put a focus onto either your own or someone else's body. You wouldn't watch a dog show or football game and ask why everyone has such intense opinions on the dogs or players. INB4 retard doesn't understand analogies and claims I'm saying feedees are the same as dogs and football players. If you post yourself online, you open yourself up to the opinions of others, as is their right. You don't get to control what other people think of you or how they express it. You don't want comments, don't post yourself.
If you want to sell your body on the Internet and turn yourself into a product, it is no longer an entertainer/audience interaction, it is a business interaction. If they were just posting themselves on Instagram or Reddit or whatever and not making any money off this fetish, that would be different. It wouldn't preclude them from the unsolicited comments and criticism that is inherent in being a public figure and voluntarily choosing to not only put themselves online, but direct the focus of their online persona specifically to their bodies, but they wouldn't owe anything to their followers. However, since they DO sell themselves and they DO rely on their online reputation and interactions to do so, it is ABSOLUTELY their obligation to share any and all information that would directly influence their customers' decisions on whether to spend their hard-earned money or not. To suggest otherwise is nothing more than greed and entitlement. You don't get to make money off people and also lie to them and do whatever you want just like McDonald's doesn't get to advertise that they sell cheeseburgers made of beef, then turn around and sell burgers made of rat meat and not tell anybody.
The expectation in buying videos of feedees that are outwardly claiming to be intentionally gaining weight is that the feedee is actually gaining fucking weight. They don't get to market a product, change the product, then continue marketing the different product as being the same as before. That's exploitative false advertising and tricking their customers into spending money that they otherwise might not have had they known the truth. So many women in this fetish don't fucking get that and it's infuriating. They want to just show up, do whatever they want and beg for money, and also be free from any and all responsibilities that come with treating their fetish like a business. If there's money changing hands, the responsibility goes both ways.
I see it on Instagram all the time. Accounts post on their stories daily begging for money, then complain when the people who are interested in doing so are being entitled when they aren't comfortable spending their money if the person they're sponsoring tries to attach a massive laundry list of caveats and stipulations that put all leverage in the feedee's hands and none of it in the hands of the person who is actually spending their money. Of course, there are also horny shitheads who will waste people's time claiming that they're going to be their feeder, then fail to deliver on any of the things they said they were going to do. Every transaction is a contract, and that means both parties have to hold up their end. You don't get to ask people to spend their money on you, then assume no responsibility when it's discovered that you aren't holding up your end of the deal and potentially haven't been for some time.
Side note, don't fucking say that people buying fetish videos from feedees are objectifying them by expecting them to do what they say they're doing and don't act like objectification such a morally reprehensible thing to do when THEY'RE the ones LITERALLY objectifying THEMSELVES. They are turning themselves and their bodies into commodities that can be bought and paid for. If they're not going to treat themselves with the self-respect of not making and selling porn of themselves, do not expect there to be any sort of expectation of the people who respond to these actions in the manner which is inherently invited by doing so to treat them as though they haven't just purchased a product. Making porn is objectifying by nature, so you don't get to accuse the people who consume it of some great wrong if you aren't ready to condemn the creators as well. They choose how the present themselves and treat themselves, and anything that comes along afterwards is nothing more than the consequences of their own actions. If they don't want to be looked at as nothing more than someone you can get off too, they shouldn't post and ask for money for videos that do exactly that. The onus is not on the consumer to acquiesce to every entitled whim and expectation of the person whose porn they buy. They don't post these videos in an attempt to establish deep interpersonal relationships that demand the respect one might give a friend or girlfriend, so why should a customer buying the video then be chastised when they don't afford that level of respect to the subject of the video? Everyone knows it's creepy and pathetic to treat a pornstar you've never met like your girlfriend or like they owe you anything more than what you paid for just because you watch their stuff, and everyone knows that pornstars aren't trying to be your girlfriend just by way of posting videos, so let's just cut the shit and just leave it at they get out what they put in. They want to objectify themselves, they're gonna get objectified by others.
