>>73463I enjoy this kind of drama from these kinds of people, almost as much as seeing their work. HOWEVER, I feel as if there is some things that should be made clear.
Any artist, FAFcomics, or anyone else, has the right to make their work as exclusive and as expensive as they like. If an independent artist's decisions were to cause them to face financial losses, it is only the artist alone who suffers for their own actions. These artists also have the right to protect their work using ethical and legal methods. Their stuff is their rightful property, and can be protected with rightful means. And these people also have the right to have and describe their opinions about the other people who leak their paid content, even if those opinions are deemed extreme and unpopular by the majorities of other groups (such as users in this thread). I, like many others, will never purchase any kind of digital art content from anyone, solely out of principle. If I cannot get something I want that is behind a paywall, I either wait for it to be freely available, if it ever does, and just deal with it. Sure, I don't particularly like being talked down on so lowly by others. But it is just someone else's opinion on the internet. I do not let it bother me. And people like FAFcomics are best off not letting opinions such as mine or the other users in this thread, bother him.
I suppose it is also fine for some of us to laugh at some of the publicly available information about FAFcomic's self, his conversations, and his actions. It is just part of having a presence on the internet. I just want ONE thing to be clear. So long as FAF comics does not commit crimes, or causes any unwanted drama outside his social circles, then I cannot see anything that is objectively wrong with what he does. Even if we think it is funny or pathetic.
Is any of that unreasonable?