>>15553your point doesn't stand at all. infact you never made a solid argument to begin with.
your basically saying if someone draws a child sexualized fictional or real, its ok.
it has TONS of bearing on characters like cream because they look and act like a child. people are not gonna act like something is not wrong when you find something that looks strikingly like a child attractive. and like someone said before in this thread:
>>15440 your argument falls apart instantly when there's another rabbit that looks like cream but doesn't look or act like a child.
the fact that you're defending porn of cream when there's vanilla just screams you wanna touch yourself to a little child.
if anything you have a lack of comon sense. it's easy, don't draw something that looks like a child. and besides why would you other than it being hot to you?