Any idea why female feeders aren't as common? It seems like plenty of women date and fuck fat men but they just don't get as autistic about it? It's always been funny to me how many female feedees are legitimately into growing enormously fat but the idea of being with a fat man does nothing for them. At the same time, I've noticed a pronounced uptick in female feeders, especially on tumblr, and often they're already in relationships so it's not like they're just playing a role for the money. I know some people here will suggest it's because fat is feminine but I've known of many fat women who feel more masculine from gaining weight. Also, bisexual women exist. I'm fat myself and have had experiences with bi women who arent into feedism or anything who still like grabbing my chest when we fuck.

Feeder is mostly a provider role, just like caregivers, finsubs and most dominant roles. Women on average prefer being cared/babied/spoiled/etc.

>>57123
I don't think this is true. It's well known that there are women who purposefully date disabled men because they like being caretakers, and it wouldn't be much of a stretch to extend this to feederism. (The youtuber Boogie said he dated a feeder who wanted him immobile.)

>>57132
"On average"
Of course there will always be exceptions, but they are rare.

That's why female feeders are a lot less common, but they do exist.

Strong chance female feeders are good cooks, and American women aren't cooking like they used to anymore.

It's because feedism is a fetish and males are more prone to fetishism. Also that male sexuality is 1) visual, 2) mostly hardwired from early childhood (when fetishes develop), while female sexuality is more fluid over their lifetime, and 3) active rather than passive. It's the same reason you see so many more male violent criminals than women.

>>57123
You bozos are so tied up in your own involuntary celibacy you try to bend reality. It's actually the opposite — women traditionally and to this day are oriented toward childcare, caregiving, as well as teaching, nursing and other supportive healthcare, etc.

I understand your confusion though. What women do want is to be supported and protected, something you're incabable of as an inadequate male.

>>57210
Ideally. A male should be provided for by his women as a king lion. Defending the territory and killing an illegitimate heirs his wives produce. Killing kids that aren’t your own is an important part of alphadom

>>57210
Listen, retard, women being oriented toward caregiving doesnt mean they're running around taking care of men. It means they’re biologically inclined to care for *offspring*. Using resources provided by guess who? The man. The whole dynamic is built on men being providers so women can focus on the taking care and nurturing the kid. The male hunts and protects the territory, while the women use such resources provided by the men to nurture children; that's what we are biologically to.

How dumb do you have to be to confuse the role of a provider and the one of a nurturer. You stupid fuck think that the women were the ones hunting and bringing in resources? Fuck no.

Here's a playlist to educate yourself:
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL848F2368C90DDC3D&si=ZKxVVI8gpsPj9L6y

female feeders are less common because of posters in here being incredibly weird

>>HURR DURR BIOLOGICAL IMPERATIVE
people used to shit in rivers and murder their kids millennia ago, why use that as an argument

jordan peterson ass bozos lol

>>57225
Women are in demand and don’t need to develop weird fetishes to scrape the bottom of the barrel for obese, amputees, and other weird fetishes.
Women let fetishes happen to them if she pulls a man out of her league, otherwise women don’t have fetishes.

>>57226
if you want a real answer, female feeders are probably under-represented in most fetish communities because of social taboos on female sexuality; we know women can be incredibly fucking kinky when given the chance to express themselves, but compare how people acted about WAP vs Baby Got Back

there were female feeders decades ago back when yahoo groups and irc chatrooms were things, they've always existed, and will become more prominent in the future as norms change

...provided morons here become a little more normal

also worth remembering; being a feeder means messing with another person's body; you are actively altering their appearance and health (to varying degrees ofc)

since women are expected my society to be more compassionate and less overt (lest ye be deemed a ho), there's far less likelihood of any fat fetishistic tendencies being brought to a partner's attention unless prompted

needless to say, I've seen far more lesbian feeders over the years posting online (but not here lol) than straight which makes sense; if you're open about your sexual preferences, who fucking cares if you're also open about scissoring and stuffing chicks

>>57225
They shat in rivers because it was either that or shitting in a bush near your cave/home lol

And it was rare for humans to kill their own offspring, unless in extreme cases, like population control, killing one for the benefit of the group/tribe. That doesn't happen anymore because humans have prospered enough to be able to handle multiple children most of the time.

And I do agree that women sexuality is more repressed than men nowadays, that's one of the reasons that we see a lot more men online in kink spaces. However, that still doesnt explain why, in such spaces, women disproportionately take on more "passive"/"receiver" roles, such as littles or feedees, compared to men.

A clear cut example of that is in Findom. Even in western countries, which the gender paying gap is getting smaller, even inverting in some areas like nursing, you will see women as the dominant ones in Findom, predominantly. Men are disproportionately more in the role of "paypigs", because in such situation, the submissive one is the provider, which is yet again seen as the role of men.

>>57227
There’s no taboo on female sexuality faggot, the only taboo is doing it for free.
The only fetish these women engage is findom.

>>57226
Presumptuous much?

>>57234

Bro y'all must be the most emotionally retarded butt ugly trolls in the entire history of the world. It's such a self own. What you are actually saying is you are so abhorrent to be around that the ONLY thing you are good for is your money. I swear to god y'all need to touch grass. I've never paid for pussy. I drive part time for uber I am basically unemployed I don't have shit. I've lived rent free from one ssbbw /normal sized attractive mid-highfunctionig autistic woman to the next since I left my parents house at 16. If you're fun to be around, know your market, and have a dick big enough to get past their folds, you're literally getting off scott free. To put it in a way you might understand: the term hobosexual can not exist if women are only into findom. Work on yourself a little bit. Get a 6 pack or figure out how to be funny. Or both. Figure out how to actually get a woman off and do it every night and you'll become heroin to them

>>57328
My dude. I’m saying this from the perspective of a tall in shape man with a massive dick.
This is what my fuck buddys tell me about the losers that wife them up.
My girls pay my bills, but I’m in the 1% and inequality in here is a bitch.