>>51368With a chan, you're going to see that kind of behavior shine through regardless of whatever thought-police activity you think should be done about it. Could we literally delete every post that isn't content on the content boards? Sure, but that would be a herculean task.
>>51425Never used it, wouldn't surprise me.
>>51818Kek
>>52563Not privvy to all the new DRM for new-fangled content delivery. I stopped caring when we got out of the clips4sale era and into the "ethereal content you consume once and it's gone" era.
>>52868Couldn't tell you, wasn't me. I don't see anything that was super wrong about it on
https://a.architect.coffee/bbwdraw/thread/499/ , maybe some of the last spoilers riled up one of the stickler mods? hard to say.
>>53051Don't know who that is, will look into it.
>>53086After implementing the VPN ban, many of our ASN and IP bans were relaxed because they had been applied in total desperation during the CP plague. However, I don't think we ever really stopped him.
>>53138That's a great question and the truth is, I don't know. I can't confirm or deny that god-emperor anon will bail us out with another year of funds when the time comes. As it stands, we have around 6-7 months left before we are in the self-destruct zone again. I will tell you that, while that donation was exceedingly generous and helpful, it may have been a double edged sword. While we weren't exactly getting tons of donations before giga-anon saved us, since then, not a single cent has touched our donation addresses. It would seem most people assume the site will survive financially and do not feel the need to donate. Yes, crypto is still a bit of a drawback but it's never been easier. So that's all to say, I don't know. I don't have the funds to get the array going again, much less the site for another year when the money goes dry. So we are either in BBWChan's twilight phase, or, again, near our decided end the clouds will part and money will rain once more. There are no guarantees.
>>53173https://a.architect.coffee/bbw/thread/169738/Easy answer there, need at least 3 images to start a thread.
>>53581Have I been slow to reply? Yep. I'll tell you why. After we got this CP thing under control, I've been taking BIG, HUGE, LONG breaks from the site. Sometimes over a week. Why? Because I needed it. Because I was fed up with dealing with this place day in and day out. Now that it's semi-stable, I'm taking my time doing other things in my life, more important things. As for the other mods, I wish they would chime in more, but there are doing the grunt work, so I'm trying to be the face, for better or worse, two or three times a month.
>>53590Definitely where we're at.
>>53607Link it on architect. Willing to bet not enough content to start a thread.