>>316418I think people here are losing sight of why Salt started his whole Feast For the Eyes project to begin with. They're supposed to be an anthology of self-contained, one-off short stories and scenarios, and that's it. Salt said he wanted to use them to "explore a variety of ideas without getting too stuck on particular storylines, and also add some more variety to my content overall." Now, whether or not those shorts have succeeded in adding more variety is another conversation, lol.
>>316419>a fetish comic doesn't need this overly positive, acceptable messageDevil's advocate: why should it not? Point me to any artist as prolific as Salt who's producing fetish comics with this sort of message. I'll wait.
>Is he gonna print a physical copy and read it to kids in kindergarten?If you really think people are gonna read Losing Control to elementary schoolkids when it gets a physical release later this year, then you're just not a serious person.
>>316442I don't understand why people glaze Lucy's Stuffing so much. Visually, it's incredibly boring; she's just masturbating to herself (both literally and metaphorically) in a empty void for most of it. While there's nothing inherently wrong with this, the sequence of panels where she's actually stuffing herself aren't all that interesting either (when it should be!). More eroticism is conveyed in a 3-6pg habutton short than this entire 20+ fetish comic. I can understand why Salt abandoned remastering it because had he continued with Lucy Restuffed, it probably would've looked like a complete different product had he finished.