>>280806 > You're retarded"
>>280762 > "Fuck off"
>>279532 > "Bitch bitch moan"
>>278943 > "Shut the fuck up already"
>>278539 > "You're a fucking idiot"
"Forgive me for not gleaming your intelligence from your wonderfully insightful input thus far," Mr Medrano, you fucking teenager. Your comments are short and you're an asshole, so it's not hard to picture you as an idiot as well.
As for your point, it's not uncanny if the artist does it right. For as much as some people probably would like to see SDC draw immobile blobs, that can only be interesting to a certain extent. If she's done it before, didn't like the results, and would probably churn out more mediocrity if forced to, then it's the 'immobile' part that's the problem, not the blob part. All she'd have to do is stay on-model with the human body; none of those 'cartoon' tropes where the girl's skeleton elongates or she becomes gigantic.
Granted, it often DOES look uncanny if the artist is inexperienced and sucks at their job, or they take ComicalWeapon's approach of just rolling with cartoonishness. However, SDC doesn't. She also doesn't necessarily need practice drawing immobility-sized characters so much as she needs to stop teasing her audience just to avoid having to draw them. When there ARE artists who can do mobile and huge, SDC's avoidance of trying what they do can lead to boring, samey bullshit like with how washed up Mizz-Britt has been lately. A higher number of different character sizes and shapes would mean less characters blend together visually and motivationally. All the better if the fantasy of it isn't bogged down as hard as it would be in the real world.
